Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CherryBlackStone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 01:51, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

CherryBlackStone

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Absolutely non-notable band with searches providing nothing useful (a search at Highbeam found nothing) here, here, here and here. I'm not sure if Damage_(British_band) is a possible move as it basically sums what alot of these sources above say. It's not surprising there's not much as they had one single and one album (release date unconfirmed) and are unsigned "still looking for a record deal so we can take our sound to the masses" (the masses has apparently not happened yet). SwisterTwister  talk  05:45, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 16 May 2015 (UTC)


 * {|cellpadding=0 style="border: 1px solid #A3A3A3; background-color: #FFFFFF" align=left width=auto


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Davewild (talk) 07:19, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * }

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - Band article of unclear notability, lacking coverage in multiple independent references. Only RS coverage appears to be the 2006 The Sun article, on its own not sufficient to establish notability. Dialectric (talk) 17:40, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:47, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: Download only single in 2006, album yet to be announced. Well, that's about that, isn't it? No indication that the group achieved notability. The copy in the article is pretty pneumatic. Hithladaeus (talk) 14:47, 29 May 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.