Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cherussery Ahmed Kutty Musliyar (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:40, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Cherussery Ahmed Kutty Musliyar
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Stumbled across, removed some long standing vandalism, noticed the only sources were blogs. Looked around found a couple of passing mentions in books but nothing that resembled significant coverage. Appears to fail WP:GNG Dennis Brown &#124; 2¢ &#124; WER  23:27, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. G S Palmer (talk) 00:42, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Concur - delete - I PRODded this a while ago. Still question notability.  Go  Phightins  !  01:17, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 9 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete and salt. Still insufficient evidence of notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:19, 9 May 2014 (UTC).
 * Delete and salt. After it has gone through all the past contention over notability (and failed the test previously) I am unwilling to give it the benefit of the doubt that more acceptable sources can be found. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:08, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt but encourage editors who believe they have new non-blog sources to write a Draft. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:50, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete for the same reasons I stated in the second AfD, salt because the subject isn't likely to suddenly become notable and this shouldn't be recreated over and over again. MezzoMezzo (talk) 14:32, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.