Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheryl Arutt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:37, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Cheryl Arutt

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

The subject does not appear to meet general notability requirements. Although there are a number of citations they seem to mostly be primary sources. The refs for her acting career seem to be from her hometown area newspapers of local girl does good. As far as her career as a psychologist goes all the sources appear to be primary. No doubt this person has been on television a number of times as a forensic psychologist, but there is no known secondary source for this. Perhaps merge article to here: List of former child actors from the United States Wlmg (talk) 03:29, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 11 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 15:18, 17 July 2012 (UTC)




 * Keep Actress meets WP:ENT for career under WP:NTEMP. We do not expect nor demand that someone who left acting must somehow remain in the news a an actress. Her television career began in 1979 and ended in 1991. Her Young Artist Awards nomination for "Best Young Actress in a Family Film Made for Television' was in 1985.  Her first film was as Lauren Daly in Primal Rage in 1988.  Now as a real-life forensic psychologist, she has appeared as an expert in 2009 for the TV series In Session, and again in 2012 for the series Studio B. Interestingly, now that she is not a child actor she is even getting coverage for her expertise as a forensic psychologist by such as CNN.  But still, and not being too concerned of the addresable issue of the article not making use of them, a little WP:BEFORE shows her childhhod acting career can easily be verified in such non-primary sources as USA Today, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Times-News , Los Angeles Times, News and Courier, Washington Post, Daily News of Los Angeles, The New York Times, Chicago Tribune, Montreal Gazette, and even such as Merced Sun-Star and Anchorage Daily News.   Her career has turned in a different and sourcable direction, but notability is not temporary.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 07:19, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:03, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Keep Passes WP:ENT. CNN is a reliable source. --Artene50 (talk) 04:48, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment Yes CNN is a reliable source, but if you check the references in the article there are no less than six cites that are from CNN. I see the problem here that they all are primary sources of transcripts of Cheryl Arutt interviews. Dr.Cheryl Talking, but no one talking about Cheryl--Wlmg (talk) 22:27, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
 * One might hope that CNN has a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy even when sharing interviews... but that's the recent stuff and can be sourced directly to the projects themselves. Her earlier work as a child actress establishes WP:ENT and is verifiable away from the CNN interviews of her as an adult. Even if the article does not make use of the other sources listed above to verify her early career, it is verifiable none-the-less as having recieved some amount of attention. WP:NTEMP.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 10:11, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:20, 31 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep per MQS: enough past and current coverage to meet WP:GNG.--Arxiloxos (talk) 20:54, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.