Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheryl Cole's Night In


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Relisting isn't a button you press when you're not sure what to do. Only relist when it is actually necessary. In this case, it is not, consensus is clear, so, we're done here. Courcelles 23:31, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Cheryl Cole's Night In

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

The program isn't noble enough. --L.Geee 18:24, 10 September 2010 (UTC) - (AFD created by User:LittleGee - linked to the account by Off2riorob (talk) 19:23, 10 September 2010 (UTC))


 * Keep - notable well referenced article. Nomination from a Saturdays fan appears to be connected to the deletion yesterday of their show Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Saturdays:_24/7 - I suggest eary closure. - Off2riorob (talk) 19:16, 10 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - Completely notable. --SitDownOnIt (talk) 08:55, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 18:05, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep notable, well referenced Adabow (talk · contribs) 10:13, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: I probably could have NAC'd this as keep instead of relisting, but I would rather defer to an admin. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 18:05, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I have no idea why you did that, if you are unsure leave it alone, this is a clear close as keep it is not a BLP. annd there is no reason at all to relist. Off2riorob (talk) 18:10, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * This discussion has gone beyond the 7-day discussion period. When I come across an AfD that has gone beyond 7 days without being closed or relisted, I assume it has fallen through the cracks. I have found several AfDs in the past that were months old. I only relisted to get some admin visibility. Frankly, I don't care if someone comes along right now and closes this as keep. I typically only NAC technical matters that require absolutely no judgment of consensus, such as withdrawn nominations or open discussions where the article has already been deleted. It sounds like you would prefer I leave stale AfDs alone, without knowing who, if anyone, is watching them, and potentially for weeks or months. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 18:41, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.