Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheryl Cran (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 04:10, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Cheryl Cran
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I spent a few minutes doing a quick copy edit and cleanup, hoping to bring some clarity to the article. I removed all the links to the subject's promotional profiles on various online training sites. The information in this article is all fairly available on the official website. We're not a web host. There are claims to authored books, but they all appear to be self-published. A search for reliable and independent sources merely returned a boatload of profiles on promotional sites. Little else here. In my opinion, it's wholly promotional, rather than encyclopedic. (Note that the previous AFD was closed when an editor deleted the article as spam. The 3rd article listed at the right is for a different subject.) Lacking additional reliable and independent sourcing provided here, I would recommend deletion. Cindy ( talk ) 19:50, 30 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - Delete as NN. Vanity page.   red dog six  (talk) 21:37, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Sir  Rcsprinter,  Bt  (Gimme a message)  @ 22:56, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Sir  Rcsprinter,  Bt  (chatter)  @ 22:56, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Sir  Rcsprinter,  Bt  (talk to me)  @ 22:56, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Sir  Rcsprinter,  Bt  (parlez)  @ 22:56, 30 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. There are no references provided that are independent of the subject. A google news search only comes up with articles she has written or brief, trivial mentions in news items that are not about her. Fails WP:GNG.  freshacconci  talk talk  00:45, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete I speedied this as spam last time out. The creator has taken note of my comments at that time, so it's improved enough that it at least merits this discussion. However, there are fundamental issues of insufficient notability and self- (or more like employee-) promotion.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  05:28, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't meet the guidelines. Figureofnine (talk • contribs) 15:04, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.