Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheryl Mrozowski


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. The article does not meet WP:RS and WP:BIO standards. However, there should be no prejudice against a possible near-future recreation of the article with proper referencing. Pastor Theo (talk) 00:37, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Cheryl Mrozowski

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unreferenced, notability unclear, and only purpose is as a magnet for vandalism from someone who has a problem with her son. I can't get the page protected, so why not delete it and be done with it. JNW (talk) 01:56, 21 July 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ( X! ·  talk )  · @178  · 03:15, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.
 * Keep. I added a reference. -- Eastmain (talk) 02:58, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rhode Island-related deletion discussions.  -- ( X!  ·  talk )  · @166  · 02:59, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak delete I'm not seeing sufficient notability. And the article needs a lot of work. ChildofMidnight (talk) 16:43, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep: A contestant in the Miss America pageant at least has as much notability as the interminable list of reality show finalists whom people deem notable. That an article has been vandalized is not part of any criteria for deletion under deletion policy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ravenswing (talk • contribs) 03:31, 28 July 2009
 * Delete No significant coverage in reliable sources to show notability. Search turned one source that Eastmain has already added and another trivial mention. - SpacemanSpiff Calvin‡Hobbes 03:53, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete Seems almost (albeit barely) notable, if perhaps greater documentation could be found.  But if not....KevinOKeeffe (talk) 04:29, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. Needs further references but shows a bit of notability. --TitanOne (talk) 05:07, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.