Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheryl Najafi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  So Why  07:22, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Cheryl Najafi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I am unconvinced that WP:BIO or WP:NAUTHOR are met. This essentially boils down to whether Houston Lifestyles & Homes and Arizona Foothills Magazine are considered reliable sources for the purposes of establishing notability. Given their local scope I'm inclined to say that they don't. SmartSE (talk) 09:48, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:57, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:57, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:57, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: The questions raised by the nominator warrant some more discussion

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  10:24, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Her work is well-known per WP:NAUTHOR (#3 on The New York Times Bestseller list; http://archive.li/ujbKl, https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C06E3DF133EF934A25755C0A9649D8B63); her work and she have been the subject of multiple reliable sources: Huffington Post, Sacramento Bee, Phonix New Times, The Gazette, Celebrate Magazine, The Denver Post, Mercury News. Looks like a Keep to me per WP:NAUTHOR.  Lourdes  11:17, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep- Close call but appears to fulfill GNG from sources showing in the footnotes. YMMV. Carrite (talk) 11:38, 18 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.