Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chester's guide to: The controversy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:21, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Chester&
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Some minor event in 2003 that involved Google being made to take down a link to a pedophile website. Not notable enough to require an article. Incidentally, the whole thing is written in mangled English translated from some other language, and it has a stupid title. —  Scott  •  talk  03:28, 29 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Support deletion Badly written, not notable for article, not referenced etc. --80.193.191.143 (talk) 10:20, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:15, 29 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  11:38, 7 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - The title is sensationalistic. The subject appears in a couple of sources, but the extent of coverage is not significant. Fails WP:GNG.- MrX 17:26, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, insufficiently notable event. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:57, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.