Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chesty Morgan (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America1000 00:44, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Chesty Morgan (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NMUSIC no secondary sources Domdeparis (talk) 12:23, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  15:04, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  15:04, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  15:04, 13 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - It does just need one or two more references, but as it is, it does not have enough to warrant it's article. With Thanks - Lee Vilenski(talk) 15:36, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Strong keep - Was a very well known band in Sweden, in particular during the 1990s (which may explain that there is not as much news coverage online as there would have been about a present day band). Has been covered in articles by Sweden's largest newspapers such as Svenska Dagbladet and Dagens Nyheter . In connection with a car accident in 2001 which killed the band's leader at the time, Erika Janson, Sweden's largest evening paper referred to Chesty Morgan as a "cult band" . /FredrikT (talk) 19:46, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Additional information: The band has released 8 records between 1996 and 2005 according to the media database of the Swedish National Library: . /FredrikT (talk) 19:55, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. A quick Google search found several newspaper articles. I suspect a more thorough search would yield plenty to justify an article. --Michig (talk) 07:38, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947 ( c ) (m)   20:29, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - article status is quite weak but that is not a reason for deletion. A simple google search came up with plenty of hits. Also per WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 21:40, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - As Fredrik T. Not huge, but nog enought för än article.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.