Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chet Childress


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Icestorm815 •  Talk  04:10, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Chet Childress

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Four different users have prodded this article, each time removed without improvement. It has had a notability tag since its creation in February by a user whose only edits were about this person. He is professional, but the article does not assert its extent and notability to pass WP:ATHLETE. Reywas92 Talk 02:57, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:44, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete One sentence is not an article.--Amadscientist (talk) 04:08, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Given that this article was three sentences when you read it, what made you think that rationale had any application? We call such short articles stubs, by the way, and if sources exist from which they can be grown, deletion policy is to keep stubs.  Uncle G (talk) 11:52, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep A lot of online sources prove the notability of this skateboarder. Childress appears to be a well-known person in the skateboard world and Wikipedia entry may be useful for the readers. I've added relevant links, check it, please. Amadscientist, we shouldn't judge the size of the articles at AfD, but the notability of the subject. --Vejvančický (talk) 05:01, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete INsufficient notability to meet guidelines. Substantial coverage in independent reliable sources needed. ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:46, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete cannot find anything to support article expansion and this is probably why the article has languished for the last 6 months--AssegaiAli (talk) 13:45, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.