Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chetan kamble


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  15:40, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Chetan kamble

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article dePRODded by article creator (probably the subject himself) without reason stated. Prod reason still stands: "Local politician with minimal coverage. Does not meet WP:GNG, WP:BIO, or WP:POLITICIAN." Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 14:46, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 15:57, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 15:57, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 15:57, 27 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Municipal councillors only get an automatic presumption of notability, just for being municipal councillors, if they serve in an internationally recognized global city — which Aurangabad is not. Outside of that deliberately narrow range of cities, a municipal councillor is eligible for a Wikipedia article only if they can be explicitly demonstrated as passing WP:GNG, which this article very much fails to do. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 18:41, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as none of this suggests better for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister   talk  04:51, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep He serves as the Mayor of a city of nearly four million people. Dozens of discussion on American mayors of much smaller cities have resulted in the articles being kept. Some coverage found here as well AusLondonder (talk) 07:24, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment According to our article on the Aurangabad Municipal Corporation as well as their own website state that the mayor is Trimbak Tupe. Note that the creator of this article has now removed almost all text from it, not sure what to think of that. --Randykitty (talk) 08:27, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * He's not the mayor, he's just a "corporator" (=councillor). Bearcat (talk) 14:28, 28 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Vanity article, which in earlier versions made false claims of significance. Looking only at content which is actually sourced to reliable sources, he is not notable. (I don't know where AusLondonder got the idea that Chetan Kamble was a mayor. That claim is not made in any of the past versions of the article that I have seen. Maybe it's there somewhere. Or did Chetan Kamble just assume that "corporator" meant "mayor"?) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:48, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment The (incorrect) claim of being mayor was made in the very first version of the article. As stated above, it is not supported (and, in fact, contgradicted) by reliable sources. --Randykitty (talk) 09:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Randykitty for that clarification. I'm not sure how I overlooked that. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Not a notable politician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:18, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
 * delete - does not meet GNG or notability criteria for politicians. This recent edit makes it clear that it is an autobiography. The user is now focusing on promoting himself as a writer and had created articles about a book and a movie script he has written - but he does not seem to meet WP:CREATIVE (and his publications are clearly not notable either). --bonadea contributions talk 07:32, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete the only notable thing is the author's blatant attempt to promote his book. Bazj (talk) 07:38, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete The creator is creating articles with the same name link Fitindia (talk) 11:36, 2 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.