Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chhatra Lok Janshakti


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. User:Goodvac's analysis is persuasive and carries the consensus.-- Kubigula (talk) 16:50, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Chhatra Lok Janshakti

 * – ( View AfD View log )

youth department of a political party fails WP:GNG Night of the Big Wind  talk  14:32, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 26 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 15:35, 2 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Why should there be an article about the youth division of a political party when Wikipedia doesn't even have an article about the party itself? --Metropolitan90 (talk) 19:49, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep – Per Google news link for this AfD, topic is covered in The Hindu, The Times Of India, India Today and others. Article needs sourcing, cleanup, better organization. Adding rescue tag. Northamerica1000 (talk) 02:15, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Well there's the issue of how deep this coverage is. While you're certainly right that the topic is mentioned, I'm struggling to find in those sources any real info on the group. All of the articles seem to mention it once, in a sentence like "A, B, C, and the Chhatra Lok Janshakti oppose this" or "another student candidate for XYZ was a member of the Chhatra Lok Janshakti". Do you know of any sources that have less trivial coverage? Thanks.--Yaksar (let's chat) 23:55, 3 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep They get some mentioned for their activities. If the group wasn't notable at all, they'd not be mentioning them in various major news source of India.    D r e a m Focus  18:46, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete This party fails the GNG. The results in Google News archive are all trivial mentions:
 * "the Students Federation of India (SFI) and the Chhatra Lok Janshakti (CLJ) have added two more parties"
 * "Chhatra Lok Janshakti leader Mrityunjay Kumar said"
 * "United Students' Front (USF), the newly formed alliance of four parties, Students' Federation of India, Chhatra Lok Janshakti, Samajwadi Chhatra Sabha and Ambedkar Students' Organisation"
 * "Other parties like the leftist All India Students Assocation and Students Federation of India, the Chhatra Lok Janshakti"
 * "other outfits like the Nationalist Student Congress, the Chhatra Lok Janshakti and the Samajwadi Chhatra Sabha"
 * etc.
 * The closest to significant coverage I can find is "Chhatra Lok Janshakti joins hands with NSUI" from The Hindu, which provides no substantial information about the party. It merely covers the routine event of Chhatra Lok Janshakti shifting its support from United Students' Front to National Students' Union of India. Goodvac (talk)


 * Delete fails WP:GNG, all sources uncovered so far make trivial mention of this subject. Effort should be focused on creating a good article on the party itself where a breif mention of this subject would be appropriate. RadioFan (talk) 13:46, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * delete good vac makes an excellent point, there is insufficient in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 13:50, 14 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Stubbleboy 00:03, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete no indication it meets or will ever meet the inclusion criteria. Mt  king  (edits)  04:08, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable, thanks to Goodvac for some pretty impressive digging. --Ifnord (talk) 15:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.