Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chi-Town Bulldogs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:38, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Chi-Town Bulldogs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article appears to have been written by a disgruntled would-be player. Team never played, was only a proposed expansion that never happened. In fact, it seems the team never even got to exist before it folded. I think this means it fails to meet the notability criteria given at WP:NSPORTS. KDS 4444 Talk  13:20, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 6 June 2014 (UTC)


 * delete Never happened. No notability. Staszek Lem (talk) 15:39, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Wasn't written by a bitter player, but the ABA is an amazingly unstable league where teams can come and go every day; this seems like one of them with no games played.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 18:59, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete: Aborted attempt to start a team; no evidence of anything especially notable happening with it. (On a related note, though: I find interesting the unsourced claim that someone collected $100 from each person for so-called "tryouts" for team that never formed.  I wonder if that ended up being the main profit of this operation: I'll bet making a logo and a couple signs and renting out a high school gym isn't that much expense to get a few dozen people paying you $100 just to screw around on a high school basketball court.  If there's a reliable source that this sort of thing is happening in the ABA, maybe it should be in the main ABA article.) --Closeapple (talk) 21:06, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Generally, we are generous with franchises in professional sports. I understand that this is a regional semiprofessional sport, but I can see solid evidence that the team existed from respected sources: a Eurobasket.com recent alumni list and USBasket.com current team info.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:51, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Both of those citations shows the appearance of the team's name on a list, but neither says anything else about them. The fact of mere existence is different from notability, yes?  And isn't notability considered the defining character of any Wikipedia article?  I do not disagree that the team existed (at least in some theoretical sense) but I do not see evidence of notability.  KDS 4444  Talk  08:08, 8 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - Per above. The team never played a game and didn't garner enough press to automatically meet GNG. In general, the new ABA doesn't get enough coverage for its teams to meet GNG in my opinion.  I had a franchise in my hometown for three years and didn't even know it - the local paper didn't even cover it. Rikster2 (talk) 12:07, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.