Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chiang Rai fried pork


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. It is possible that a valid article could be written about this dish, but consensus here is that the current article fails WP:NOTRECIPE. If somebody wants to try to write a better version, I (or any other admin) can restore the original contents to draft, to use as a starting point. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:22, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Chiang Rai fried pork
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Personal essay-like recipe with no references to establish notability. Dgpop (talk) 13:27, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: this is probably a notable dish, but as it stands the article is a complete mess, falling under WP:NOT. FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  13:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:14, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:14, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment The Thai name for the dish is หมูทอดเจียงฮาย (Google search: ) Notable websites simply describe how to cook the dish. (from MCOT)  (TNews)  (Manager) --Lerdsuwa (talk) 16:48, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:18, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete the article in its current form per WP:NOTRECIPE. --Dps04 (talk) 16:54, 30 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.