Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chibchan Women


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 00:08, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Chibchan Women

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Personal essay written a number of months ago, then abandoned. Originally prodded by myself, but de-prodded with edit reason "This is far too elaborate and interesting to delete without debate. In fact, I'm not sure why the rationale given justifies deletion at all." Proposing for deletion to gather opinions from others. RTucker 00:50, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Chunks of this make sense, but taken as a whole, it is incoherent, lacks context, and is pretty much useless, I would say. Anyone knowledgeable enough to save this could probably rewrite it, so let's get rid of it. Brianyoumans 01:28, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm almost inclined to say db-nocontext, but the biggest problem I have is that it rambles, and only briefly touches on the subject title.  It reads like a badly written school essay.  -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 01:49, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Very little context here, as Dennis says. If there was another article on the parent culture, portions might be mergable to there, but I really can't see saving this. Akradecki 04:08, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Billy227, Review my account!! talk contribs sndbx usbx 14:35, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete even though some parts are somewhat interesting. Think maybe someday we'll have an EssayWiki? Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Actions • Words))) 14:51, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete Not much context in the Article. Arnon Chaffin Got a message?  15:53, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Stronger delete. Essay, highly WP:OR, writer needs to find a different soapbox, and his smarmy reaction to prod almost guarantees my vote to delete. Realkyhick 16:54, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.