Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ChicagoPride.com (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:12, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

ChicagoPride.com
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Completely unsourced and semi-advertorialized article about a web publication. As always, websites aren't "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass WP:GNG on their sourcing -- but this is completely unsourced, and has been tagged for advertorialism issues since 2013 without ever being toned down, and in fact has been toned up if anything. The first discussion from ten years ago is also not definitive; our notability and sourcing standards in 2022 are tighter than they were a decade ago, and even on the "Google Books" search that was proffered as a reason to keep in 2013, I'm not finding GNG-worthy content about the website so much as I'm finding directory entries for the website. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt this from having to have any real sourcing. Bearcat (talk) 06:26, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sexuality and gender, Websites,  and Illinois. Bearcat (talk) 06:26, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Poorly written article, reads like an advertisement. Doesn't meet WP:WEBCRIT. Google Books results in sources that provide trivial coverage. Couldn't find any sources in other locations that meet GNG. ProofRobust  22:21, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't think this website is notable and I cannot find press sources for it to make the article better. Ghost of Kiev  (talk) 20:52, 21 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.