Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicago (art magazine)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NorthAmerica1000 05:05, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Chicago (art magazine)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable art magazine Seattle (talk) 03:45, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete This is a sporadically published magazine issued by a group of non-notable artists in editions of 300 copies. "Chicago" is not the name of the ongoing magazine project, but is rather the name of one issue of the magazine. That's part of the gimmick - each issue has a different name. If anyone can uncover significant coverage of the venture in reliable sources, I will reconsider. Otherwise, delete. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  04:53, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:07, 22 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete: The more appropriate name for the article may be ztscrpt which seems to be the name for the overall venture . Or perhaps theselection or simply zeitschrift. Regardless of the name problem though, while it sounds interesting, I am seeing no evidence that it is notable. In addition, the text as it exists is an extremely close paraphrase of this page, close enough to be a WP:COPYVIO. AllyD (talk) 08:24, 22 December 2014 (UTC) I've now changed this comment to a "delete" as I haven't found anything substantial and sourced which could replace the Copyvio text and demonstrate notability. AllyD (talk) 17:41, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:37, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.