Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicago Storm (soccer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 12:01, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Chicago Storm (soccer)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable defunct soccer team from non-notable league. Fails GNG. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia talk  15:57, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia  talk  15:57, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions.  ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia  talk  15:57, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:23, 23 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete as they appear to be a non-notable team. At most consider a redirect to American Indoor Soccer League. GiantSnowman 16:56, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Why would you redirect them to the American Indoor Soccer League? They were members of the Major Indoor Soccer League (2001–2008). KitHutch (talk) 18:32, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose They were members of the Major Indoor Soccer League (2001–2008), which was a notable soccer league. All other members of that league have pages.  However, getting rid of the Ultimate Indoor Soccer League is fine since it's not notable. KitHutch (talk) 18:36, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Per WP:NTEAM, teams must satisfy GNG and there is no inherited notability from notable players or leagues. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia  talk  12:46, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 22:50, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, Per nom. fails WP:GNG , Alex-h (talk) 09:29, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - playing in the MISL is only a weak presumption of notability. No indication that this topic passes WP:GNG, which, ultimately, is the requirement here. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:44, 8 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.