Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicano vendido


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:08, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Chicano vendido

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. I know that in some cases (for instance the "N-word") an ethnic insult has enough historical and cultural importance so that "not a dictionary" can be ignored. In this case the expression is said to have been coined in the 1960s  popularized in 1967, after over 150 years of Mexican-American history. I have never heard it before and I just don't see it as being that important, or for that matter reflecting the attitudes of most Mexican-Americans. Jaque Hammer (talk) 09:57, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Google searches showed almost nothing. The first image was Buzz Lightyear in his Spanish mode from Toy Story 3. :-) -Jaque Hammer (talk) 10:03, 10 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  —Cnilep (talk) 11:41, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Doesnt seem worthy of an entry to me either.Thelmadatter (talk) 18:28, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:37, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:13, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I'd suggest a merge, but I'm not sure where to. The scope is too broad to merge to Los Vendidos or even to Chicano literature, and I'm not sure what part of Chicano it could be merged to. I don't think the content should be deleted, so I vote keep pending a decision on where it should be merged to. Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 18:05, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete I'm not even seeing any solid evidence that this term as described in the article even exists, much less is widestpread and notable enough for an encyclopedia article. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  01:50, 31 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Not notable enough for an WP article.--Bobbyd2011 (talk) 12:02, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.