Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicken Madras

for previous AfD see Articles for deletion/Chicken Madras/old  This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. This had already been transwiki'd. See []. Rossami (talk) 23:26, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Chicken Madras
While it sounds very nice; yet another recipe to transwiki to the cookbook.. Sc147 00:50, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, trivial, doesnt belong here. Megan1967 02:26, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Transwiki. Kappa 03:15, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * I don't know where the discussion went, and why the other edits don't show up in the history, but I found "Chicken Madras --> Wikibooks. Gentgeen 11:11, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC)"here, and " 03:05, 25 Apr 2004 Cecropia deleted "Chicken Madras" (deleted per consensus; now in cookbook)" here (I was having major deja vu). Niteowlneils 03:24, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Wikicookbook Gazpacho 02:57, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep in Wikipedia, consider as a stub and improve the article. We should not delete stub, that prevent them from growing. SweetLittleFluffyThing
 * It's a recipe. It doesn't belong in the main encyclopaedia. Has very little potential for growth. Megan1967 22:47, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Transwiki recipe, Keep stub article. -CunningLinguist 12:34, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and transwiki; why should one keep the stub? Lectonar 13:53, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Transwiki and delete - a recipe alone is not an article. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 17:01, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.