Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicken Park (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) — ΛΧΣ  21  03:20, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Chicken Park
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This page was nominated 5 years ago, with no consensus, and and the hope of improvement. Since then, it has remained low quality, and is not notable. drewmunn talk 07:49, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn by nominator The page has been much improved since this nomination was opened, thanks to all involved. drewmunn talk 18:10, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment. I'm finding things, but most of it is rather trivial in nature and the only two things of real note would be the MDZ Online and Shock Magazine reviews. The other two are more offhand remarks than anything, as far as I can tell. Maybe this would be better served as a redirect to the director's page?Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   09:22, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:38, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Turkish release name:
 * Spanish release name:


 * Keep per being a suitably sourced stub C class and, though nice to strive for, there is no requirement that it ever be a C, B, GA or FA. Also, as it had its original Turkish release as Piliç parki and several months later in Spain as Pollo jurásico, we need to search away from English language sources for a non-English language film.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 22:38, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Snow Keep, time to close. Cavarrone (talk) 09:09, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Big Kudos for the fine work. Perhaps the nominator might withdraw so this can be speedy closed.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 13:08, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The request has seemed to have the desired effect (backup desired effect); the article's been much improved. I'll withdraw on the condition that a little extra work is put into expanding the lede, just so a better overview can be given. Cavarrone, serious thanks are in order, you've done extremely well. Thanks as well to Michael and TokyoGirl79, you really kickstarted the improvements. drewmunn talk 18:07, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.