Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicken shop


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. Mmm, chicken. Tony Fox (arf!) 22:34, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Chicken shop

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

It would be nice if there were a speedy criterion to cover this mess. I'm praying for SNOW. - Dank (push to talk) 21:53, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  -- - Dank (push to talk) 21:54, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  -- - Dank (push to talk) 21:54, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete. Good gracious. Let it snow. Vicenarian  (T · C) 22:02, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete seems like original research.--Caspian blue 22:03, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * G1 No meaningful content. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 22:06, 28 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete probably not enough reliable sourcesSallyRide (talk) 22:13, 28 May 2009 (UTC)


 * delete - because Fried chicken restaurants already exists, and i don't think there's much in the article that could be added, and the existing article uses the Guardian reference that I thought might save this one. Baffle gab1978 (talk) 22:22, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Do we have WP:SNOW? Vicenarian  (T · C) 22:26, 28 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete G1 as nominated by me a while ago. ukexpat (talk) 22:27, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.