Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chickering Livestock


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If anyone thinks they can use the current contents to create an article that meets the notability guidelines then I will happily userfy for you. Davewild (talk) 19:50, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Chickering Livestock

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of importance Rberchie (talk) 14:42, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

This was a Major Center in The United States for the Purpose of Selling Livestock during the Years 1940 through 1960 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sawdawgman (talk • contribs) 14:52, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vermont-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:04, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:04, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:04, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Userfy Sawdawgman, for an article to be included in Wikipedia the topic needs to pass WP's policies on WP:NOTABILITY, which you should read. This appears to be your first edit, and creating new articles on WP is actually quite complex. The article can be moved to your own sandbox (under your account, which you create at User:Sawdawgman/sandbox) where you can work on it until it is ready for publication. I suggest also looking at Articles for Creation which is a process by which your article can be viewed by others and suggestions made for improving it. This article is not ready to be in the main wiki space -- yet. Good luck, and feel free to visit the Teahouse where you can ask questions about how to do things. LaMona (talk) 02:37, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Userfy - Of all my searches (News, Books, Newspapers Archive, highbeam and thefreelibrary) this was the best result. SwisterTwister   talk  18:23, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:05, 20 June 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:36, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing worth saving. Should evidence of notability be found it would be better to start from scratch. --Michig (talk) 11:25, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - no indication in the article why it should be notable. Kraxler (talk) 19:41, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete due to lack of non-trivial coverage from reliable publications. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:14, 6 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.