Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chief Hacking Officer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 09:32, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Chief Hacking Officer
WP:NEO Neologism John Nagle 21:11, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

It's clearly a neologism, but there appears to be a person at eEye, a computer security firm, who actually has the title "Chief Hacking Officer", and he's responsible for almost all of the 119 hits in Google. The news article cited in Chief Hacking Officer seems to be a re-invention of the term. --John Nagle 21:11, 3 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per above. --John Nagle 21:16, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and WP:NEO. Kala  ni  [talk] 21:19, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. GentlemanGhost 02:49, 4 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - I suggested in the corporate titles page that linked to this one that CHO probably shouldn't be listed, but I'm new to Wikipedia and am still learning how best to do things. Perhaps I should merely have suggested 'CHO' for deletion from the originating article? Sweetman 00:53, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Nacon kantari  00:53, 5 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.