Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chief Sunrise Education Centre


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Note that the nominator !voted keep later in the discussion. North America1000 02:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Chief Sunrise Education Centre

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Has no visible verifiable references from reliable sources, other than a single source which is (self) published by the organization which runs the Centre. Contested PROD. —  Jeff G. ツ (talk)   03:45, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Commemt I seem to recall all high schools are automatically notable if we can prove they exist(ed). Can someone confirm? Legacypac (talk) 04:26, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Once you prove it exists with verifiable references from reliable sources in the article, I will change my !vote.  —  Jeff G. ツ  (talk)   06:10, 16 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep -, that is correct, but the standard for proving its existence is lower than you think. As long as it is a diploma granting institution and not a tutoring center or other primarily commercial venture, all that is needed for proof of existence is its own website, which we have here. This is per notability guidelines for schools at WP:SCH/AG and WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. As far as outside reliable sources go, they are going to be few and far between given this institution's location. I find the numerous blog hits to the local news blog for Hay River to also be convicting on this outfit's existence. Doubt that a newspaper would do too well way out there. The blog is no doubt their substitute for it. Whereas I wouldn't source BLP stuff to it, it does make a compelling case for the school's existence. John from Idegon (talk) 17:22, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per . Not striking out anything because it is technically still true.  —  Jeff G. ツ  (talk)   14:14, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:59, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:59, 21 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.