Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chief Thunderbird


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  12:38, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Chief Thunderbird

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completely unsourced article about a film actor, whose roles were nearly all as supporting characters rather than major ones. As always, actors do not get an automatic free pass over WP:NACTOR just because roles have been listed -- they qualify for articles if and when they can be shown as the subject of enough reliable source coverage about them to properly support the article. But the only hint of sourcing here is the external link to his IMDb profile, which is not a reliable source for the purposes of establishing notability -- and the article has now been tagged as unsourced for almost two years. Bearcat (talk) 16:57, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Montana-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:01, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:01, 6 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. Quick Googling shows that Thunderbird (Richard Davis) gets substantial attention in Reimagining Indian Country: Native American Migration & Identity in Twentieth-century Los Angeles (UNC Press, 2012), where we learn that he was "leader of a Cheyenne dance troupe, lecturer on American Indian history and culture, and actor and technical advisor for Western movies" as well as the founder of a national Native American organization called "First Americans". He shows up in other books such as . And there's this about his childhood as one of the first "hostage-students" forced into the "civilizing" program at Carlisle Indian Industrial School in 1879. --Arxiloxos (talk) 18:11, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. FloridaArmy (talk) 21:05, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment editors who find additional coverage should add it to the article under consideration.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:57, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Anyone can add to and improve the article. FloridaArmy (talk) 16:36, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:56, 13 December 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ansh 666 07:57, 21 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.