Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chief visionary officer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus. W.marsh 00:33, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Chief visionary officer


Was tagged with prod as an advert, but I don't think it is. However, I'm not sure it's notable anyway, so I'm posting it here for more feedback. UtherSRG (talk) 15:36, 9 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Weak delete. 16800 google hits, but only one seems to be actually talking about the term. Thus, it doesn't meet WP:V. -Amarkov babble 15:41, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable jargon/consultant-speak. If the term is more widely used in a couple of years, by all means put it in then. But not now: not yet notable. WMMartin 15:51, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Why has this got a page on Wikipedia scope_creep 19:47, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * weak keep It's a real thing. You generally have to have a really big buisness to have a 'Chief Visionary Officer' but also you need someone wwho wants that title, like Steve Jobs, and so not all that common. The article needs sourcing, and could be better written. Robovski 01:03, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete neologism, does not really seem to be notable yet, even if there are a couple of famous people it's been applied to, and Wikipedia is not a dictionary. --Xtifr tälk 01:23, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Even though the article's a mess at the moment (per Robovski), this role has been around since at least the late 1990s - I've added one citation.--Mereda 17:55, 10 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.