Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chieftec


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:09, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Chieftec

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Lack of coverage in secondary sources other than routine listings. AfDing because it was prodded at least one time in it's past. Savonneux (talk) 21:01, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Company is only mentioned in passing in reliable sources, thus lacking notability. Meatsgains (talk) 22:17, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- a micro-stub article on a non-notable company. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:01, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:39, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:39, 7 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - I recently erroneously prodded a second time for lack of notability. ~Kvng (talk) 14:16, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Ethanlu121 (talk) 21:48, 9 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.