Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chika Arimura


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:11, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Chika Arimura

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Yet another unsourced blp for a porn performer whose only claim to fame is an in house award that has been shown repeatedly not to confer notability. Blps deserve better than this. Fails gng and the discredited Pornbio. Note that the main win is for the film not her. Spartaz Humbug! 19:48, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete no sources indicate notability. These Japanese articles need to be held to much higher standards of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:27, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:11, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:18, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:18, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:18, 11 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - No evidence of notability and hasn't won any significent awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG .– Davey 2010 Talk 03:08, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails PORNBIO, NMUSIC and the GNG. The claimed awards fail the "well-known and significant" standard. The article provides little to no nontrivial sourcing, and no more appears available. Being a member of a nonnotable musical group, and having a bit part in a video game contribute next to nothing to notability, and in the absence of sourcing at least approaching GNG standards would not be sufficient to establish notability anyway. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006.   (talk) 15:53, 17 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.