Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chika Honda


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 19:30, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Chika Honda

 * – ( View AfD View log )

While it is referenced that this person was convicted of a crime, it does not seem to me to be a notable per WP:BLP1E and WP:CRIME. The case does not seem to have resulted in significant legal precedent or change in the public's views of the law. RJFJR (talk) 14:12, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Subject and crime is not notable. --Ozgod (talk) 23:39, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 29 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Non-notable crime, single event. Fails WP:PERPETRATOR. WWGB (talk) 02:57, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:PERP. LibStar (talk) 03:07, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep, somehow -- As a BLP, I agree it fails WP:BLP1E, but if it is renamed and reworked to be about the Walkley Award-nominated radio feature, it might be able to stand, assuming it can find the relevant references. --Mark Hurd (talk) 04:58, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Only known for a single event of heroin trafficking. --Vic49 (talk)  23:22, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.