Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chikorita


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of generation II Pokémon. ✗ plicit  04:37, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Chikorita

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Yet another Pokemon of dubious notability. This was one was PRODed but dePRODed by a mass dePRODer. PROD was "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar." Reception section is tiny, much shorter even than those of recently redirected articles, and consists only of few passing mentions that fail SIGCOV. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:38, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  03:38, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  03:38, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  03:38, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  03:38, 28 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Redirect I don't see how this minor Pokemon would be notable. Fails WP:GNG and what little there is of the reception section seems a bit NPOV.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 05:07, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of generation II Pokémon per nom. No significant coverage. Link20XX (talk) 14:03, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect per WP:GNG and WP:POKEMON. The reception section is virtually devoid of meaningful commentary, and much of the rest of the article isn't much more than a laundry list of every appearance its ever made on games and movies. It's wikia material, not Wikipedia. Sergecross73   msg me  03:31, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect Agree with the above regarding lack of SIGCOV CiphriusKane (talk) 08:43, 3 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.