Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Child Labour: A Review in the Context of Nepal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 03:38, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Child Labour: A Review in the Context of Nepal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No content. Seems to be an essay, not an article on any topic. Tamra vidhir (talk) 11:39, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment Article was created merely half an hour before this nom, and just over an hour as of now. Give it a chance, and perhaps even reach out to help shape the article well.  野狼院 ひさし  Hisashi Yarouin 12:23, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - But it's not an article. It's one's personal analysis. It's titled Child Labour: A Review in the Context of Nepal...it's clearly the user's personal analysis on the condition of child labour in Nepal. So I feel that it should be immediately declined. --  Tamra vidhir  (talk) 12:29, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Putting aside that I agree that this is true, I was concerned that the editor's first ever article creation was AfD-ed in such a short time is too WP:BITEy. If experts can confirm it is not, I will confirm a delete.  野狼院 ひさし  Hisashi Yarouin 13:04, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Addendum: No wait, their talk page reveals there are previous contribution history (that I could not see, because they're deleted?). Confirms delete.  野狼院 ひさし  Hisashi Yarouin 13:07, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Reply: In fact if you look at the name of the user's first article which was later deleted, even that appears to be an essay. --  Tamra vidhir  (talk!) 15:37, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:20, 14 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete It is a thesis report, aka an essay. docstore version and his personal blog version. The blog version may or may not contain viruses, so view the docstore version first.   The rule is to wait 15 minutes before attaching any tags, unless it is a blatant speedy. Personally, I would have waited a bit as it appears they were working on it.  But, it is a judgement call.  In cases where it appears to be an essay or copied, then do a Google search first.  Search on some quoted sentences.  That is how I found the above two links as I searched for "Child labour is a serious and wide spread problem in South Asia and African countries and the situation is not different in Nepal also.".  This normally would be a case for a Speedy under copyright violation, but docstore's copyright is "Public Domain".  Bgwhite (talk) 04:45, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Reply: So that means that we should wait for 15 minutes since it was created before tagging it. But if it should be immediately deleted then we should nominate it for deletion. and again docstore's content is in public domain. But it's again one's personal thesis. So in that case it should be deleted, na? I'm confused. :/ --  Tamra vidhir  (talk!) 10:09, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Looks like a prospectus. Non-notable book, many of the facts have been well included on Child labour in Nepal. Bladesmulti (talk) 06:03, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Looks like bookpromo and a content fork of Child labour in Nepal. No need to keep this. The Banner talk 04:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - essay/promo/personal analysis/synth/OR/content fork, as per what others have said. Neatsfoot (talk) 03:33, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.