Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Children's Health (magazine)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Rodale, Inc.. (non-admin closure) Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 02:38, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Children's Health (magazine)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a magazine that doesn't seem to exist. Unfortunately, I spent a minute or two tidying up this page which came as a Random article. The article gave a website for the Chidlren's Health magazine which is actually the website of Men's Health, published by the company that supposedly publishes this, Rodale. That company's website has no mention of Children's Health. A reference on the page was to a report on www.earthtimes.org that was not there - searching through the site did not reveal it. A Google search brought up some references to the magazine (but not the magazine itself): most useful is this press release which suggests it was a one issue special produced jointly by Men's Health and Women's Health in 2009. As such, the article is misleading but, more importantly, this appears to be a non-notable minor publication. Emeraude (talk) 17:15, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete (and perhaps redirect): Confirmed by the same article by Reuters - Children's Health was a one-time issue. הסרפד (Hasirpad) [formerly Ratz...bo] 01:45, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Rodale, Inc., no need for deletion at this time, redirects are cheap, someday could be useful info. Cheers, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 16:06, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 17:57, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 17:57, 15 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 04:52, 20 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Rodale, Inc. I agree, deleting is too premature.--Joey (talk) 07:50, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.