Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Children's feet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Tone 15:06, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Children's feet

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article can just be redirected to foot. Aerosprite the Legendary (talk) 02:03, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep there are multiple medical journal sources that are cited. What policy or guideline does this article break? --Guerillero &#124; My Talk   03:13, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - I see the nominator's point, but if it's a decent article and its well-backed, I don't see why we would get rid of it.  ceran  thor 05:27, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  -- Danger (talk) 06:16, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Rename to foot problems in children. The medical specialty of orthopedic surgery came about for this reason, and there are still numerous reasons (such as clubfoot, hip dysplasia etc) why it might be useful to have a general page about foot problems in children. JFW &#124; T@lk  14:47, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Rename, agree with JFW. This article is about foot problems in children not children´s feet per say. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 22:49, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep as plenty of references show notability, I am not opposed to a rename. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:52, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep and rename - there are enough differences between a developing foot and a mature one that a separate article is indicated. Suggest Podopaediatrics, Podopediatrics, or Pediatric podiatry as title. - 2/0 (cont.) 20:25, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Rename per JFW. The content is okay. It needs clean-up and better referencing. Axl  ¤  [Talk]  10:47, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep "The nominator ... fails to advance an argument for deletion...". Colonel Warden (talk) 20:27, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: I have mooted a rename discussion here so that there will be a record with the article if we decide to move it. - 2/0 (cont.) 07:38, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.