Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Children of Eber


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. Star  Mississippi  03:07, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Children of Eber

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Page has been unsourced and orphaned for nearly 14 years. The article itself seems to just be copy-pasted bits from the Bible, I doubt it even qualifies for WP:N. Zhomron (talk) 15:59, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:09, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Discussed in depth the Journal of Sacred Literature and Biblical Record  and covered in the writings of John Bunyan . SpinningSpark 16:30, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Move to Draft: The content is not written in the Wikipedia tone and it needs lots of structural changes and verification because it doesn't even passes WP:GNG. It might be a notable topic, but currently the article doesn't pass the notability criteria. After moving the draft, the editors can make the required changes, and then it can go through AfC.   ❯❯❯  Chunky aka Al Kashmiri   (✍️) 17:51, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Draftify Text is almost incomprehensible and offers multiple generalized points of view without a single source. A full delete, however, seems wrong here. ~ Pbritti (talk) 05:27, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Move to draft and heavily revise as people have suggested. Also if it is to exist as an article it ought to have some kind of contextualization and explanation of how this concept is understood or discussed in recent years or centuries. agree with above, somewhat incomprehensible at the moment. Dan Carkner (talk) 15:49, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Draftify not sure why that was not the immediate answer to the unsourced article. Bruxton (talk) 16:12, 29 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.