Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Children of Peace International (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ especially with respect to the depth of sourcing. Star  Mississippi  02:21, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Children of Peace International
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Last AfD was 13 years ago. I'm not finding significant coverage to meet WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 00:06, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Vietnam,  and Colorado. LibStar (talk) 00:06, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree with what's written in the nomination. MaskedSinger (talk) 07:53, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  00:46, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - Here is substantial coverage in the Fort Collins Coloradoan. Here is a meaty piece on a joint effort of COPI and the local Soroptomist Club in the Jackson Hole News and Guide. This is just the continuation of a front-page story from the Star-Herald. That should nudge us past WP:NORG. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 15:29, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:07, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep I believe that the article does meet WP:ORG there seems to be just about enough coverage to satisfy. As well as the articles given by Nat Gertler, I found an article from the LA Times that mentions them. The article could use more references but I don't see a need to delete. GoldMiner24 Talk 00:57, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * The LA Times article is a 1 line mention, hardly WP:SIGCOV. LibStar (talk) 08:26, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep - A worthy article for Wikipedia. Needs more sourcing. — Maile (talk) 03:42, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Being worthy is not necessarily the same as notable. LibStar (talk) 23:01, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, like Nat Gertler above, I am seeing enough on newspapers.com to suggest that this could go beyond the threshold needed for WP:NORG. Albeit a fair chunk is related more specifically to the founder Binh Rybacki, yet it seems the two are broadly indistinguishable. Coverage combined seems enough to me that we can look at retaining, though would be good to actually get the material written to the article. Bungle (talk • contribs) 21:13, 13 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.