Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Children of Tsunami: No More Tears (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  11:27, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Children of Tsunami: No More Tears
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Documentary that appears to fail WP:NFILM. Nothing in a BEFORE convinced me that this is notable. Previous AfD was no consensus in 2015. Donald D23  talk to me  01:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 01:29, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Donald D23   talk to me  01:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions.  Donald D23   talk to me  01:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions.  Donald D23   talk to me  01:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions.  Donald D23   talk to me  01:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Donald D23   talk to me  01:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  03:57, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, there is no evidence that it addresses the requirements of WP:NFILM. Dan arndt (talk) 07:45, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete - This production appears to be popular with viewers and has attracted some commentary online, but the kind of serious coverage from reliable sources that we need for a full article is lacking. Popularity is not notability. I think that deletion is the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 07:46, 8 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.