Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Childstar band


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. clearly obvious that the delete arguments are much more stronger, not to mention the WP:SPA as well  JForget  23:58, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Childstar band

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Apparently non-notable band. Third-party coverage looks rather trivial; apart from that, contains links to blogs and official pages of the band (Myspace, Facebook, Youtube etc.). Only one album released so far. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 16:41, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable. I nominated a previous incarnation of this for speedy yesterday Wuh  Wuz  Dat  18:05, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Altough non-notable, all content in conformity of what a particular article should have. 122.2.214.243 (talk) 18:14, 30 July 2009 (UTC) — 122.2.214.243 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment Above comment was originally place on the talk page of the article in question. I have copied it here to facilitate the deletion debate. I have no oppionion on this page myself.  Fei noh a   Talk, My master 18:36, 30 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom. RP459 (talk) 18:51, 30 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. indie band notable. should be reconsidered.Colchisdelight (talk) 19:01, 30 July 2009 (UTC) — Colchisdelight (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Keep, notable underground. 122.2.223.50 (talk) 19:06, 30 July 2009 (UTC) — 122.2.223.50 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Malttexture | talk ) 19:18, 30 July 2009 (UTC) — Malttexture (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep just consider. Notable as independent artist via search engine and local news article.


 * Keep.Well researched. Notable independent artist. Mymusictrip (talk) 19:37, 30 July 2009 (UTC) — Mymusictrip (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 19:37, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  -- – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 19:37, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Trivial coverage, meets none of the WP:N or WP:MUSIC criteria, not signed with any label, let alone a notable one, single album release, no evidence of notable tours or singles, etc. The   Seeker 4   Talk  19:46, 30 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:BAND — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ttonyb1 (talk • contribs)


 * Comment. The band name makes searching for notability difficult (confusion with a movie called "Childstar" and many "child star" actors). A better use of keywords gets some searches revealing very little coverage, while a different search gets plenty of hits. Fishing between all the MySpace, Facebook, MP3, Lyrics sites, etc. there seems to be little in the way of significant coverage in reliable sources -the Manila Times reference is just one article, so I suppose that is not significant coverage.  The references provided, might do more for the article if they were proper inline references to online sources that readers could use to verify the claimed notability.  Astronaut (talk) 22:46, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unsigned. End of story.  Starczamora (talk) 05:52, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.