Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chills (entertainer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snow deleted. Previously discussed at Articles for deletion/Chills (YouTuber). DrKay (talk) 16:48, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Chills (entertainer)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non notable internet celebrity who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. A before search turns up nothing of substance. They are a rapper but do not satisfy any criterion from WP:SINGER. Celestina007 (talk) 22:20, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:20, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:20, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:20, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alberta-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:20, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:20, 28 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Nothing of substance, non-notable individual. When the views on Youtube are that high and they still have no coverage in the media, I wonder how many of them are inflated by bots to try and game advertisers... Oaktree b (talk) 14:13, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom -Xclusivzik (talk) 17:52, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not meet parameters of WP:YOUTUBE guide. --Whiteguru (talk) 10:47, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , Are you sure you meant WP:YOUTUBE? I don't think it's relevant to deletion discussions (notability). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:46, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
 * WP:YOUTUBE gives a guide with regard to viewers. A guide, is all. --Whiteguru (talk) 09:27, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:NBIO Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:46, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: coverage is weak and reliable sources not found. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 05:17, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, Not enough coverage by independent reliable sources. Alex-h (talk) 12:32, 2 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.