Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chilltime


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Stifle (talk) 21:56, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Chilltime

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

nn social networking website Gilllnnm (talk) 05:44, 10 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Deletetime. JBsupreme (talk) 07:48, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete could be a speedy for no assertion of notability --Pontificalibus (talk) 08:11, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Appears to pass WP:WEB and WP:V. There are several sources that attest to this website's notability. Here is an article from Jornal de Negócios and this article from MSN, this article from Dnoticias, and this article from Meios & Publicidade. These sources seem to show that this company passes WP:CORP. I don't read Portuguese, so hopefully a Portuguese-speaker can evaluate whether the sources I have cited are reliable enough. Cunard (talk) 09:12, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:16, 17 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:53, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep if the Portuguese sources are good. Bart133 t c @ 16:22, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.