Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chiltan threat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 17:28, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Chiltan threat

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable subject. Reliable sources don't mention such thing as a "Chilean threat" as confirmed through a WP:BEFORE search. -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 17:49, 15 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Merge. I am assuming this article is referring to environmental threats to Koh-i-Chiltan. The fact that articles currently lack sources, or may not be written in perfect English, is not a valid reason for deletion. We can use our brains and not just Google to look beyond the search term "Chiltan threat" --Animalparty! (talk) 17:59, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:50, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:50, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:51, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:51, 22 October 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:27, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment if the content was sourced, this would obviously be a Merge to Koh-i-Chiltan. It might be best deleted, as it's a new article with no sourcing. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 04:15, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:DEL7, completely unsourced and unverifiable. A merge would be inappropriate given that it fails WP:V, our most core content policy. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:33, 5 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.