Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chimaobi C Mbataku


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 03:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Chimaobi C Mbataku

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable businessperson who fails WP:GNG or any applicable SNG. Suspected UPE and COI going on here. There's no source that could establish GNG. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:21, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Entertainment,  and Nigeria. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:21, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Not much for Inclusion. Some what of inherent promotional article. Needs much sources to establish a stand alone notability. Simply no clarification of importance. All the Best!  Otuọcha   (talk) 16:34, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:08, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep: As the article is a stub and would need much sources to establish a stand-alone notability.--Afí-afeti (talk) 06:10, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: A google search brings up only |one news source about a company he appears to own, which appears to be mildly promotional in nature. As such, this article likely fails WP:GNG and, alongside the aforementioned promotional nature and possible COI, also fails WP:NOTPROMO. ArkHyena (talk) 17:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Very few mentions (<10) when doing a search. Doesn't sound notable. Rrjmrrr (talk) 21:18, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SIGCOV and WP:MILL. One good source by definition is not multiple sources for significant coverage. We have long agreed that "executive producer" is so common that it's not indication of independent notability from the film or TV show. Bearian (talk) 14:23, 8 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.