Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chimera (geep)

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete as unresolved copyvio. Rossami (talk) 01:41, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

chimera (geep)
I think this article is inappropriately named, as a geep is simply another example of a chimera. I've moved the contents to the stub at geep. --Laura Scudder | Talk 19:50, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. As per the above.--Silversmith 20:20, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
 * If you merged the content, the normal process is to turn this into a redirect (in part, because it's the easiest way to preserve attribution history - a requirement of GFDL). Redirects are cheap.  Rossami (talk) 23:44, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Comments. First, the text has much in common with this. Second, the title is inappropriate, as User:Laurascudder pointed out. Geep is a better title. The issue of copyright has to be worked out no matter what the title. Fg2 03:27, May 5, 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.