Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/China Okasi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 00:48, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

China Okasi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The common theme in the notability guidelines is that there must be verifiable, objective evidence that the subject has received significant attention from independent sources to support a claim of notability. This has not been shown.

No subject is automatically or inherently notable merely because it exists: The evidence must show the topic has gained significant independent coverage or recognition, and that this was not a mere short-term interest, nor a result of promotional activity or indiscriminate publicity, nor is the topic unsuitable for any other reason. Sources of evidence include recognized peer-reviewed publications, credible and authoritative books, reputable media sources, and other reliable sources generally. This has not been shown. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeraldoAbbson (talk • contribs) 03:26, September 1, 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment This discussion page was created without the afd2 template and was never transcluded to a daily log. Fixed now--I offer no opinion of my own at this time. -- Finngall   talk  20:49, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment, the nominator of this afd has only made a few edits outside this article (nothing since creating this afd on 1 September), including adding 15 tags to an article of under 300 words, a case of WP:OVERTAG? Coolabahapple (talk) 14:36, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:43, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment, added women project to article talkpage so participants are notified of this afd. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:46, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable journalist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:32, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 23:44, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as a non-notable. Maybe too soon. Maybe someday. Quis separabit?  03:18, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. There are zero reliable sources for this BLP. Its just too soon as of now. Bearian (talk) 19:06, 25 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.