Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinese Christian Church Milsons Point


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 06:10, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Chinese Christian Church Milsons Point
An nn article about a church in Sydney. It contains no information about why it is in any way notable or encylopaedic. Only gets 149 Google hits.  Páll  (Die pienk olifant) 04:54, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn church. --Ter e nce Ong 13:04, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. --Ed (Edgar181) 13:56, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn. DakPow  e  rs  ( Talk ) 19:05, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unless thirdparty sources are found that indicate verifiabilty or notability. A search of an Australia New Zealand database came up with nothing about this particular church worthy as it may be. Capitalistroadster 22:01, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- Capitalistroadster 22:05, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete no evidence of an unusual/noteworthy characteristics.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 00:11, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for non-notability. --Roisterer 03:28, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Individual churches are generally non-notable. --Metropolitan90 02:11, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - the church is quite historic (as is the building too). What makes a church article notable or non-notable? Can people think about this before you just say delete? (JROBBO 13:27, 28 May 2006 (UTC))
 * How is it noteworthy/historic? What separates it from the hundreds and thousands of other churches in Australia? Did something historically of note happen there? Does its hierarchy include people who have been noted in Australian national media? That's how you can start asserting notability. It's easily to say that "******* is the second largest Chinese Christian church in (choose country besides China)," but that in itself doesn't make it notable, I'm afraid. More is needed in the article. B.Wind 21:33, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
 * How is it noteworthy/historic? What separates it from the hundreds and thousands of other churches in Australia? Did something historically of note happen there? Does its hierarchy include people who have been noted in Australian national media? That's how you can start asserting notability. It's easily to say that "******* is the second largest Chinese Christian church in (choose country besides China)," but that in itself doesn't make it notable, I'm afraid. More is needed in the article. B.Wind 21:33, 28 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.