Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinese Journal of Sociology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 19:57, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Chinese Journal of Sociology

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article dePROD by article creator without reason given. PROD reason still stands: "Non-notable new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article creation WP:TOOSOON. Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 12:06, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - No evidence of WP:GNG notability and unlikely to be notable based on it's very short time in existence.- MrX 15:35, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Rhododendrites  talk  \\ 00:45, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Rhododendrites  talk  \\ 00:45, 21 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment - I think this is 《中国社会科学》in which case, if Google translate is accurate, it's a notable journal. It seems they do a quarterly English version. We need some expertise familiar with Chinese academia. —Мандичка YO 😜 02:15, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * That's incorrect, the subject in question is an English-language journal, if you look here. 《中国社会科学》 is translated as Social Sciences in China and is a Chinese-language journal. Timmyshin (talk) 02:22, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:41, 23 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Zero coverage in English language media. For a scientific journal this means lack of any notability. My very best wishes (talk) 04:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.