Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinese Language Institute (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:24, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Chinese Language Institute
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Media coverage that was noted in the first AFD is about the founders, nothing significant about the school. It is yet another unremarkable language school with no claims to notability, failing to meet WP:GNG. It is clearly a business, rather than a public educational establishment, and should therefore meet WP:NCORP, which it fails to do. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a place for small companies to promote their businesses,WP:NOTDIRECTORY Iamchinahand (talk) 04:05, 21 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Iamchinahand (talk) 04:17, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Iamchinahand (talk) 04:17, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Iamchinahand (talk) 04:17, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

First AfD for this article → Articles_for_deletion/The_Chinese_Language_Institute Iamchinahand (talk) 04:53, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Obviously promotion for the high-street-style language cram school. Sources are either dead, repeat the same information, local news only, or student newspapers with low circulation. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:19, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Some minor coverage focusing more on individuals rather on business. Fails WP:NCORP. Generic and non-notable.  scope_creep Talk  14:24, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete -It is not notable, looks promotional. - MA Javadi (talk) 22:25, 24 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.