Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinese Wooden Pony Torture


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:37, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Chinese Wooden Pony Torture

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

With a lack of sources and no matches on Google Books, it seems unlikely that this phrase will be supported by quality sources in the near future and so fails the notability guidelines. If the concept as explained does exist historically, then it may be suitable for a mention in a parent article, if reliable sources can be identified showing this is not just a sexual fantasy. Previous PROD removed so raising for full discussion. Fæ (talk) 09:56, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.  -- Fæ (talk) 09:57, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  -- Fæ (talk) 09:57, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  -- Fæ (talk) 09:58, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete with lack of sources. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 12:22, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as unsourced. Although it's easy to visualize what the author is describing, there's nothing in Google books that describes a "wooden pony" torture.  Even as an element of sexual fantasy, there's only one book reference. Mandsford 14:09, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment the talk page mentions chinese language refs... 70.29.212.131 (talk) 05:04, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - per above. Jusdafax  15:41, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete possibly redirect to Wooden horse if you are concerned its a valid search term. all google links are to this article and mirrors.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:01, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.