Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinese character tattoo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. causa sui (talk) 20:51, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Chinese character tattoo

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable, sources are blogs Kilmer-san (talk) 03:54, 3 July 2011 (UTC)


 * I can't see how this can possibly be considered non-notable, when it's so prevalent. It does need better sourcing, but I'd say weak keep.  The Mark of the Beast (talk) 04:31, 3 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete It seems like an article might be possible, but not without good sources. Steve Dufour (talk) 05:03, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * AFD is not a place to get sourcing done. Is the article sourceable or not?  The Mark of the Beast (talk) 20:43, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:40, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:40, 3 July 2011 (UTC)


 *  Delete and m Merge with tattoo and redirect. A great source is http://hanzismatter.blogspot.com/ -- Evertype·✆ 23:46, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Deletion and merging are not compatible. Do you mean "merge and redirect"? Lady  of  Shalott  23:51, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Yep. -- Evertype·✆ 09:24, 10 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge to Tattoo. I can find a few mentions of such tattoos in media sources, but nearly all of those are articles about tattooed celebrities. The topic does not seem terribly notable in itself. Cnilep (talk) 01:03, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge to tattoo. The article would fit better as a mention on Tattoo, rather than have a small article. SwisterTwister   talk  23:14, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Not-notable because: notability is not inherited.Curb Chain (talk) 08:31, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete The sources incidentally mention the article's subject, but are not about the article's subject.  Blue Rasberry    (talk)   14:53, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.