Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinese chicken curry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Curry. Lankiveil (speak to me) 13:07, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Chinese chicken curry

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No sources and no indication of significance. Tal Brenev (talk) 22:39, 3 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment, I agree with the lack of sources being a problem, but the fact that the article says "It is a common dish served in Chinese restaurants worldwide." *is* an indication of significance, and I think sources could probably be found for this article in which case I would support keeping it. That said, I see no mention of chinese chicken curry at: recipe source, ibiblio's list of common Cantonese dishes, Flavor and Fortune, a Chinese Cuisine magazine, list of recipes, and a few other places. The only thing I have found is this celtnet page which says Gali Ji Huifan (Chinese Chicken Curry on Rice) is a traditional Chinese recipe of Cantonese origin. I think somewhere out there are probably sources that could be used to establish notability, but I didn't find any.AioftheStorm (talk) 01:06, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment Until a source can be found the article should be kept, and if the creator doesn't contest or no one finds a source within a week or so it should be deleted. Tal Brenev (talk) 01:15, 4 January 2014 (UTC)Tal Brenev
 * I agree, if the creator doesn't contest deletion, and a source for this article isn't found, then it should just be redirected.AioftheStorm (talk) 03:02, 4 January 2014 (UTC)


 * redirect to Curry which already says more than this article. Mangoe (talk) 01:50, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 4 January 2014 (UTC)


 * That section doesn't have any sources either, but a redirect there would be better than deletion.AioftheStorm (talk) 03:02, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect per lack of substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Candleabracadabra (talk) 03:50, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Curry. Source searches aren't providing much, and the topic is already covered at the redirect target. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:02, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge or redirect per WP:CHEAP and above discussion. Bearian (talk) 17:39, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.